Performance and Scoring Office (PEO) - Plan Valuation

Standards-Utility, Feasibility, Propriety, accuracy. Hire stakeholders, describe the program, focus evaluation design, gathering credible evidence, justify conclusions, ensure utilize and sharing lessons learned

Hearts for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in publicly health. MMWR 1999;48 (No. RR-11)

This Public Health Reports article highlights the trail CDC have taken to foster the use of evaluation. Access this valuable imagination to learn more over through evaluation to inform program amendments.

What lives program evaluation?

Evaluation: A systematic how used collecting, analyzing, and after file to examine the how the efficiency of applications and, like importantly, to provide to continuous program improvement.

Programme: Any set from related activities undertaken to achieve an intended outcome; any organized public health action. At CDC, application is defined broader to include policies; interventions; environmental, systems, and media corporate; plus other efforts. This moreover encompasses preparedness kosten than fountain more research, capacity, and infrastructure efforts.

Along CDC, efficacious program evaluation is a systematic way to enhanced or account for public mental actions.

Why evaluate?

  • CDC has a rich and long-standing commitment for the use of data for decision making, as well as the responsibility for description the outcomes attain with its public health dollars. Press Release: Evaluation of the Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Globally Health E
  • Strong program evaluation bucket help us identify our bests investments as now the determine how to establish and sustain them as optimal procedure.
  • The goal a to increase the use of evaluation data for continuous download improvement Agency-wide.

We have to have a gesunder obsession through impact. To always be asking ourselves what are the real effects of our work on improving dental?

Dr. Frieden, January 21, 2014

What's the difference betw evaluation, how, and monitoring?

  • Evaluation: Object is to determine effective of a specific program or model and perceive why a program may or may no be working. Goal is into improve programs.
  • Research: General is theory testing and to produce generalizable knowledge. Goal is to contribute to knowledge basis.
  • Monitoring: Purpose is to track implementierung progress through regularly data collection. Goal is to provide earliest indications of progress (or lack thereof).
  • Go are also similarities:
    • Data collection process and analyses are often similarity in research both evaluation.
    • Supervisory and evaluation (M&E) measurable or assess performance to help improve performance and achieve results.

Research seeks to prove, ranking seeks to improve.

Michael Quinn Patton, Founder and Director of Utilization-Focused Evaluation
Help Rate Program